Skipping Linux_(un)secured jobs in the CI
Capturing the e-mail thread regarding this issue below.
@Kishen : Lastly, I am wondering if we should skip the Linux_Secured and Linux_Unsecured jobs when we're already running the Linux_Secured(Unsecured)_Test jobs.
@rami : If the coverage is the same then I would agree that we do not need them.
@George : the test jobs only build the unit tests it does not build all the apps (including the onboarding tool) so it misses a large chunk of the code base. With just a little makefile work we could update the make file to build everything even when test is specified. Then we could reduce the build by two.
@Kishen : You could remove the two jobs from the list. We can separately update the Makefile to address George's concern in a different commit.